Monday, June 20, 2005
Informed Correction
The fourth link in the big post two down from this deserves note of a correction, thanks to the highly intelligent and worth-reading Lindsay.
I find it interesting that the 21st commentor revises her main post, from a true correction into indeterminacy. Her refutation of some of the background to the original scare article remains sound; what impresses me is the level of thought that she gets in those comments, and her more-than-willingness to listen to them.
Nonetheless both the post and the comments are unanimous that Canadian vaccines have been 'safe' from this for longer than my readers have been alive. Whether this is justified or not is certainly worth studying... but it's nice to be able to relax.
I find it interesting that the 21st commentor revises her main post, from a true correction into indeterminacy. Her refutation of some of the background to the original scare article remains sound; what impresses me is the level of thought that she gets in those comments, and her more-than-willingness to listen to them.
Nonetheless both the post and the comments are unanimous that Canadian vaccines have been 'safe' from this for longer than my readers have been alive. Whether this is justified or not is certainly worth studying... but it's nice to be able to relax.
<< Home